Nuclear lead-lag: SMR developers broke seven months before CCJ and BWXT
Prompt v1.0
The claim that Cameco and BWX Technologies are holding an early nuclear uptrend does not survive the band data: both entered strongly bearish on 7 July and 8 July, the last two of ten nuclear names to break. The real structure is a four-to-seven-month lead-lag — pre-revenue developers rolled over first, the miners followed in June — that has now converged into a single cohort-wide drawdown.
| Ticker | Company | Segment | Trend · 13mo | 30D | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ | Cameco | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −16.0% | +10.1% |
BWXT | BWX Technologies | Naval & Shipbuilding | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −10.3% | +13.7% |
LEU | Centrus Energy | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | +5.9% | −29.1% |
UEC | Uranium Energy | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −12.8% | +5.0% |
DNN | Denison Mines | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −11.9% | +23.9% |
NXE | NexGen Energy | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −5.4% | +28.6% |
UUUU | Energy Fuels | Uranium | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −22.3% | +12.8% |
SMR | NuScale Power | Advanced Nuclear | 🔴 Cont. Bear | −19.9% | −83.9% |
OKLO | Oklo | Emerging & Specialized Energy | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −25.0% | −47.6% |
NNE | Nano Nuclear Energy | Power & Propulsion Systems | ⚠️ Emerging Bear | −24.7% | −57.6% |
12-month price & trend
| Ticker | Mkt cap | P/E | P/E fwd | P/S | P/S fwd | P/GP | P/GP fwd | EV/EBITDA | FCF yld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ | $42.6B | 165.8x | 59.6x | 17.0x | 12.1x | 61.6x | 43.8x | 68.3x | 0.9% |
BWXT | $15.9B | 44.6x | 36.5x | 4.5x | 4.2x | 20.5x | 19.0x | 31.2x | 2.0% |
LEU | $3.6B | 75.8x | 74.3x | 7.6x | 7.9x | 32.7x | 33.8x | 40.1x | -6.2% |
| Ticker | Mkt cap | P/E | P/E fwd | P/S | P/S fwd | P/GP | P/GP fwd | EV/EBITDA | FCF yld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEC | $5.5B | n/m | — | 274.6x | 55.3x | 648.9x | 130.6x | n/m | -2.2% |
DNN | $2.9B | n/m | — | 988.4x | 120.1x | — | — | n/m | -4.1% |
NXE | $6.9B | n/m | — | n/m | — | — | — | n/m | -2.5% |
| Ticker | Mkt cap | P/E | P/E fwd | P/S | P/S fwd | P/GP | P/GP fwd | EV/EBITDA | FCF yld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUUU | $3.7B | n/m | — | 35.0x | 25.0x | 80.8x | 57.9x | n/m | -3.0% |
SMR | $2.8B | n/m | — | 261.9x | 91.1x | — | 432.7x | n/m | -27.7% |
OKLO | $7.7B | n/m | — | — | — | — | — | n/m | -3.6% |
| Ticker | Mkt cap | P/E | P/E fwd | P/S | P/S fwd | P/GP | P/GP fwd | EV/EBITDA | FCF yld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNE | $1.1B | n/m | — | — | 887.7x | — | — | n/m | -3.7% |
Consensus projections
| Ticker | FY2026E | FY2027E | FY2028E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ | Revenue | +2.8% | +10.6% | +9.5% |
| EPS | +14.2% | +60.9% | +20.5% | |
BWXT | Revenue | +20.2% | +9.9% | +7.5% |
| EPS | +24.1% | +11.5% | +11.3% | |
LEU | Revenue | +2.5% | +5.4% | −12.9% |
| EPS | −42.9% | +7.1% | −26.3% | |
UEC | Revenue | −59.3% | +272.6% | +157.9% |
| EPS | +58.7% | −79.8% | −647.6% | |
DNN | Revenue | +394.2% | −27.3% | +1699.7% |
| EPS | −30.5% | −73.1% | −363.0% | |
NXE | Revenue | −68.7% | +131.4% | +32282.1% |
| EPS | −9.1% | −31.8% | +23.4% | |
UUUU | Revenue | +152.8% | +63.3% | +59.0% |
| EPS | −52.3% | −188.4% | +252.4% | |
SMR | Revenue | −26.7% | +434.9% | +101.2% |
| EPS | −74.7% | +33.4% | −18.3% | |
OKLO | Revenue | — | +364.3% | +700.0% |
| EPS | +20.2% | +14.2% | +12.2% | |
NNE | Revenue | +1684.0% | +356.5% | +39.0% |
| EPS | −23.4% | +55.2% | +34.3% |
Forward fiscal years only. Blank means no analyst coverage for that year.
The sequencing, dated
The nuclear complex did not bifurcate. It queued up. NuScale entered strongly bearish on 1 December 2025, Nano Nuclear on 29 December and Oklo on 21 January 2026. Centrus followed on 18 February. No miner broke until June — UEC on the 4th, Energy Fuels on the 25th, Denison on the 30th, NexGen on 2 July. Cameco (7 July) and BWXT (8 July) were dead last. All ten now sit in strongly bearish on the SMA-crossover signal at a score of -3, with drawdowns from 52-week highs running from BWXT's -27% to NuScale's -85%.
The "only flat names" observation is largely a data artifact: CCJ and BWXT are priced through 27 July while the other eight stop at 22 July. Measured over each name's own last five sessions, the supposedly broken names bounced — SMR +12.4%, LEU +11.7%, DNN +8.2%, OKLO +8.2% — against CCJ -1.1% and BWXT +0.8%. That is the inverse of leadership.
Fundamentals aren't the culprit
Cameco's Cigar Lake halt on 1 July, triggered by a sulfuric acid plant repair at Orano's McClean Lake mill, resolved on 14 July with 2026 guidance of 17.5–18.0 million pounds reaffirmed — yet CCJ fell from $91.57 to $84.85 over the following four sessions. Its Q1 disclosure of contracted average deliveries above 28 million pounds a year for five years is intact, and Q2 results land before the open on 31 July. BWXT's backlog rose 77% to roughly $8.65B on $1.4B of naval propulsion awards, with 2026 guidance raised to $650–665M adjusted EBITDA — while the shares slid 13.9% from 7/6 to 7/20 on doubled volume.
The macro leg holds too: term uranium contracts are being signed near $150/lb against ~$86 spot with a published term price around $94, though the same source concedes those prices came on light volumes still below utility replacement rates. UxC counted ~116 million pounds of long-term contracting in 2025, with 72 million in Q4 alone; 2026 year-to-date comparables aren't public. On policy, DOE's waiver authority for Russian LEU expires 1 January 2028, not December 2027, and the ban unlocked $2.72B for domestic LEU and HALEU capacity.
What broke instead
Multiples. Oklo, X-Energy, NuScale, Nano Nuclear and UEC each fell 8–9% in one July session as Truist initiated the developers at Hold on licensing-and-deployment risk; X-Energy carried 48x and NuScale 91x trailing EV/sales into the flush, and the NLR ETF is down ~15% year-to-date after a 50%+ 2025. NuScale's decline is operational, not a financing artifact — revenue fell from ~$8M quarterly to $0.6M in Q1 2026. Even the sell side has marked down the cash-flowing end: BofA cut its Cameco target on a revised uranium outlook. Note separately that Energy Fuels carries a rare-earth driver distinct from uranium.











